# Credits Everything under `vendor/` is unmodified upstream code, kept here so the lab runs offline against a pinned copy rather than against whatever a CDN is serving today. Versions live in `scripts/vendor.sh` and nowhere else. The full licence text for each item is in `vendor/licenses/`. Three vendored items, three licences. | item | version | licence | upstream | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | axe-core | 4.10.2 | MPL-2.0 | | | Silkscreen | v6 (Google Fonts) | SIL OFL 1.1 | | | Departure Mono | 1.500 | MIT | | ## Notes **axe-core is MPL-2.0**, which is a file-level copyleft. It is used unmodified and loaded as a whole file by `audit.html`, so nothing here triggers the source disclosure obligation beyond pointing at upstream, which this file does. It is vendored rather than loaded from a CDN because the audit runs against local files with no network, and because a version that can move underneath the numbers is not a measurement. **The two faces are under different licences**, correcting this repo's own `vendor/fonts/LICENSES.md`, which claimed both were OFL until 2026-09-03. Departure Mono is MIT. **`corpus/cache/` is not vendored and is not published.** It holds archived captures of third-party sites pulled from the Internet Archive, kept locally so the lab can census them without touching the archive again. Republishing someone else's pages is not what a citation is. It is gitignored, and it is withheld from the site by `tools/deploy.sh`, which stages the upload with rsync from `.assetsignore` and refuses to deploy if any excluded path survives. That mechanism exists because listing it in `.assetsignore` alone did **not** work: `wrangler pages deploy` never reads that file, and on this project's first deploy, on 2026-09-03, both captures were briefly served. They were removed, the deployment holding them was deleted, and every route was re-verified by comparing checksums against the local files. ## The lab's own work Everything outside `vendor/` is MIT, see LICENSE. That covers `studies/`, `lab/`, `scripts/`, the tool pages, and the written findings in NOTES.md. The studies reconstruct techniques from web design c. 1998 to 2004. They are original drawings of documented methods, not copies of anyone's pages. Where a number is cited it comes from archived markup, attributed in NOTES.md to the capture it was read from.